Przeworski-Wallerstein are Social-Democratic and postulates a transition of the capitalist economy of market towards the socialismby means of the parlamentarismo. They are reformist, nonrevolutionary,that
is to say, they try to modify the
state from the laws thatemanate of this and not with violence.These authors defend the State of Well-being and the Keynesianismothat development from 1930 approximately to decade ends of 1970, inwhere she was herself combined democracy and Capitalism. Basically:"the workers accept the institution of the deprived property ofproduction means and the proprietors of these accept the politicalinstitutions through which other groups can process their demandsindeed".As well, this State fulfills a roll preponderant,
as a referee,between the bourgeoisie and the working class (between the capital andthe work), taking part
in the economy. By means of the tax system andpolitical monetary it regulates the unemployment and the distributionof the wealth. , as well ample by law the recognition of the socialrights (vacations payments, Christmas gift, retirement, insurance ofunemployment, license by accidents or maternity, etc.), andpoliticians (feminine vote), in addition to the civilians, to thesectors to subalter to us.In relation to the Bolivian Government of evo Moral, present presidentof the Republic from 2005, can be observed as initially from theUnited Left as delegated defended from his bank the right to pronounceitself on the part of the coca growers who did not wish to beeradicated of their fields by the Bolivian troopses. These counted onthe support of the pro-government party and of the government of theUnited States
that argued that to produce cocaine leaf he was similarto elaborate cocaine and this in the region was due to avoid.After obtaining own legal function and position of agent, Evo Moral Ifound the MAS party (Movement to the Socialism), obtaining a secondposition in the presidential elections of 2002. The new governmentcontinued with antipopular, neoliberalistas measures, which generatedrejection in the population and after months of street protests thegovernment fell and obeying the law of acefalia, the vice-presidentand Titular of the Supreme Court followed one another that shesummoned to elections for 2005, which gained Evo and were the firstindigenous leader in arriving at the presidency after to have beenproducing coca grower, union leader and deputy.In its management of government, Evo is implementing measured ofdistribution of the wealth with the nationalization of the gas andhydrocarbons and in a future of the railroads. Although initially thetransnational companies that have concession for the operation of thenatural resources of the country not took it to taste, preferred toremain knowing that they have minor gain. Evo created mixed companies(state 51%) to be able to negotiate better with the multinationalcompanies. On the other hand, it summoned a constituent nationalassembly to reform the constitution and to impel an agrarian reformthat avoids the unproductive large estates and happen to be nationalearth that soon the state would divide in small parcels to give abetter life to all the poor people of Bolivia, in ample majorityindigenous and illiterate, reason why also is made and been in hissecond phase the alphabetization project. The state recognizes theoriginal towns, granting cultural, social, economic and politicalparticipation to them.By the exposed thing in previous lines I conclude that these authorsare themselves reflected in the government of Evo Moral.Antonio Negri is a autonomista Marxist. The author considers whatrelation is between the working fights and the capitalist reformingpolicy and how one of these subordinates to the other. With the crisisof 1929 economic liberalism is finished and it is to make a delestadocapitalist reconstruction with the Keyneses in opposition to theimpact of the Russian Revolution 1917, although now the working classto the capital willbe integrated.I understand that the government of Evo cannot leave Capitalismbecause he depends on the operation of petroleum and its country doesnot have own industries nor people specialized in that industry,therefore is difficult to change of production way being one of thepoor countries the more of Latin America although they reduced theexternal debt as much to him the IMF as Spain.The Marxist theory of the State establishes the difference between theapparatus of the state and the taking of the power of the state. It isthe proletarian class the one that must take the power from the stateto destroy the apparatus of the bourgeois state progressively.Althusser adds to the repressive forms (physical or not) of the Statea new concept within the apparatus of the state: "the ideologicalapparatuses of the State", these can be: the religion, the mass media,the legal system, the family. They are different from the repressiveapparatus of the state because they are based on the ideology. It ispossible to emphasize that the repressive apparatuses of the statehave a quota of ideology the same and the ideological apparatuses ofthe state with respect to the repression. All repressive andideological apparatus of the state as well has its dominant class thatnot always agrees, product of the fight of classes. Finally theideology interpela to the subjects.In the Bolivian case at issue there are proletarian class but nofarmers, therefore they become aware of class neither in nor forhimself. The State continues being bourgeois, nonsingle by the way ofcapitalist production but because it maintains the bourgeoisinstitutions and the ideological and repressive apparatuses of thestate. I do not believe that there is a tendency to the progressivedestruction of the state.
Más resúmenes sobre The Government of Evo Morales analyzed by Marxist authors - Part 1